tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6782790349293784670.post4781042483912403401..comments2023-10-04T06:06:07.716-05:00Comments on <a href="http://www.placebocontrol.com">Placebo Control</a>: Less than Jaw-Dropping: Half of Sites Are Below AverageUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6782790349293784670.post-4960365727940721442013-02-01T12:36:11.782-06:002013-02-01T12:36:11.782-06:00Dan,
Thanks for your comment. I agree 20% would b...Dan,<br /><br />Thanks for your comment. I agree 20% would be too good to be true -- if it were measuring something well-defined and consistent. Given the vagueness and inter-study variability of how "meeting target" is defined, I would expect measurement to vary wildly over time ... in which case a 20% swing seems plausible. (But plausible only because it's so close to meaningless!)Paul Ivsinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06181799073130665855noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6782790349293784670.post-45948933836933838462013-01-31T22:24:01.458-06:002013-01-31T22:24:01.458-06:00Hi Paul,
It is expected that the enrollment will ...Hi Paul,<br /> It is expected that the enrollment will follow certain distribution. It is fascinating to see the numbers. The 20% change seems too good to be true. <br />DanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com